Advancing Investment Grade Thinking in Ontario’s Energy System – The Cost of Inaction

Who Bears It?

Facilitated by Brian Dingwall

Ontario’s policy direction emphasizes affordability and reliability, yet the economic cost of delay is rarely quantified in regulatory or investment decisions. This session reframes delay as a measurable system cost — not an administrative by-product.

Why this matters now

Public funding, industrial strategy, and energy transition programs assume timely delivery. The absence of a cost-of-delay framework distorts both risk allocation and capital signals.

Working Problem

How should Ontario quantify and assign the financial, economic, and societal cost of deferred capacity and modernization — and how should those costs influence regulatory and investment decisions?

Session Outcome

A defensible framework for cost-of-delay accounting and risk-sharing design.

Session Format & Logistics

  • 5 minute expert framing
  • 25 minute focused technical and investment discussion
  • 30 minute facilitated, active problem-solving dialogue

Date: [TBD]
Time: [TBD]
Delivery: Virtual (Microsoft Teams)

Audience: OECA Members Only

This session is built directly from OECA Symposium contributions and is intended to produce investable insight and policy-relevant positions — not general updates.

Share the Post: